Knott Lab is a Nut Job Production
It's so bad I'm thinking it's a Kathleen Kennedy / Walt Disney Production
After two naps I come back to this one video. Dufus Stanley Stoll, CEO of Nuts Landing is interviewed by Adenoid Hinkel ( Tim Darnell ). He’s asked what makes his analysis different than everything else we’ve seen in the last 60 years? Answer - It’s really stupid. No, I mean it. It’s really, really stupid.
His answer is a mix of techno-babble in which he claims he corrects all the lens distortion on all the cameras on all the photos the project used. I say bullshit. I highly doubt they know all the specific, technical details of all of the camera types , their lenses, the settings on them, the types of film used, etc. I think he just took all the shit images he could find online put it into a computer program and hit play.
Also in trying to explain a straight line Stolls mentions “…and I understand the bullet trajectory and there’s some curvature and all of that.” Oi. Even a Trump hired lawyer would have a field day with this idiot.
“I’m not a ballistics expert by any means,” says the self-discrediting “expert.”
The point of that was to assume the Warren Commission conclusion of the single bullet theory is correct, a wound in JFK’s back which exits his throat and goes on to injure Gov. Connally. Well, we know that’s BS. We know this doesn’t work. You would have to move Gov. Connally about two feet to his left towards the middle of the limousine.
Stoll mentions Zapruder frames 210 and 225 in reference to Gov. Connally’s position. Were these frames used to reference when Conally was hit? Stoll says Conally is at least 6 inches too far to the right for a bullet coming out of JFK’s throat to align with an entrance wound in Connally’s back. And at Z225 he’s 10 inches too far to the right. Or he might have that info reversed. Or maybe he doesn’t know what the hell he’s talking about and should never be interviewed about anything ever.
He’s asked if his analysis points to a second shooter. “I don’t want to go that far.”
He says he was asked to analyze two shots. What two shots? What is he talking about? Doesn’t this idiot know that if his little computer show discredits the Single Bullet Theory, which by the way is one shot, it’s right there in its title SINGLE bullet theory, then that means there’s at least a fourth shot fired and therefore a second shooter?
If JFK’s back wound doesn’t penetrate his body, and it didn’t, then no SBT, then a 4th shot and a second shooter.
If JFK’s throat wound was a wound of entrance then someone is shooting in front of JFK, a second shooter.
If Gov. Connally’s back wound hit him first, not transiting JFK, not hitting JFK at all, that’s a fourth shot and a second shooter.
I think this guy Stoll thinks he’s proven the SBT is junk, that JFK’s back and throat wound could be one bullet but Connally is out of position and was hit by a separate shot, so that’s his two shots, but is too stupid to grasp that that means a fourth shot, therefore a second shooter. But he doesn’t want to go there? Then what the hell is the point of this?
Look the Warren Commission came to the conclusion based on the physical mechanical firing time of the single shot at a time bolt action rifle and the Zapruder film that only three shots could have been fired by one assassin. One shot missed the whole limo and hit the curb sending bullet fragments and or cement stone fragments upwards that hit bystander James Tague in the cheek. So, that’s one bullet. One bullet hit JK in the head. That leaves one bullet to do all the non-lethal wounds in two men that became the single bullet theory. So, if the single bullet theory is false and those non-lethal wounds were caused by two bullets that makes four shots, a second shooter, conspiracy.
Stanley is STUPID!
How can anyone be this stupid?
Stoll wants others to use his data and evaluate it. Why hasn’t he evaluated it? Isn’t that what he was paid to do? Well, he can’t be bothered.
But he does think JFK was shot in the back and it came out his throat and that Oswald fired that shot.
Who is behind this? Who paid this guy to do this? And to do it this badly?
Yep, him.
John Orr and I are general partners of the partnership that has funded this effort. This is the most accurate recreation of Dealey Plaza on 11/22/63 AND the positioning of the limo occupants that has ever been done using the latest technology and also accurately . We have even taken into account that Elm Street has been repaved several times. If you ’d like more information or arrange a private viewing, send me a private email and I will discuss with John.
Lawrence Schnapf - The anti-Environment Environmental lawyer.
55 East 87th Street #8B
New York, New York 10128
212-876-3189 (office)(primary)
917-576-3667(c)
Larry@SchnapfLaw.com
www.SchnapfLaw.com
2016-17 Chair- NYSBA Environmental Law Section
AV Preeminent Rating from Martindale-Hubbell
Listed in New York Super Lawyers-Metro Edition 2010-22
Listed in Super Lawyers-Business Edition 2011-22
Listed in The International Who's Who of Environmental Lawyers 2008-22
Chambers USA Client Guide of America's Leading Lawyers for Business
Adjunct Professor of Law- New York Law School (Courses: Environmental Law and Practice; Brownfields; Real Estate Finance and Transactions)
Larry goes on to say:
and just to let you all know, Stoll of Knott Labs has limited knowledge about the assassination. He usually makes serious misstakes when he publicly speaks about this project. I have asked John Orr to take steps to muzzle Stoll.